Yiming Dang vs Olivia Carneiro Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jul at 09:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Dang vs O. Carneiro

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dang 1 - 0 Carneiro
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yiming Dang winning 2 and Olivia Carneiro winning 0. The last match between Yiming Dang and Olivia Carneiro was at the W35 Sao Paulo, 16-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Yiming Dang getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dang | 1 |
| Carneiro | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Sao Paulo(07-16-25)
Y. Dang vs O. Carneiro H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 40.74% (44-64) | Career Total W/L | 15.00% (3-17) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Dang vs O. Carneiro Match Preview:
- In recent matches, Dang has outperformed Carneiro on second serve points, achieving 38.02% compared to Carneiro's 31.58%. Does Dang's superiority in this area suggest an advantage in the match prediction? It's likely.
- Within return game performance, Dang wins 52.49% of opponents' second serve points, while Carneiro only manages 31.25%. This clear difference demonstrates Dang's stronger return ability.
- When returning first serves, Dang has a slight edge, winning 34.48% of points compared to Carneiro's 33.33%.
- Under pressure, Carneiro has saved 54.55% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Dang, who has saved 47.7%.
- In the past year, Dang has been more successful overall, winning 29.03% of matches, whereas Carneiro hasn't won any of their matches.
- On clay, both players perform relatively well, yet Dang shows a higher career win percentage at 56%, over Carneiro's 38%.
- Dang participates mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, having a 31.58% win rate, while Carneiro plays in lower-level tournaments with no wins.
- Against stronger opposition, Dang competes with opponents averaging a rank of 398.35, compared to Carneiro's 734.5 average opponent rank.
- If matches extend to a deciding set, Dang has a 30% success rate, whereas Carneiro has not won any deciding sets recently.
- In terms of break point conversion, Dang shows more efficacy, successfully converting 41.8% of chances against Carneiro's 28.57%.
Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the recent performance and historical data of both players, several patterns and disparities emerge. Dang exhibits a higher winning percentage, particularly in second serve points and return games, which are critical aspects of tennis.
Carneiro shows a minor edge in saving breakpoints, highlighting potential resilience under pressure. However, this may not compensate for the overall stronger stats Dang demonstrates in various other facets of the game.
The surface performance on clay provides an additional advantage to Dang, given their higher career win percentage compared to Carneiro. This accords with Dang's tendency to compete against more highly-ranked opponents.
Considering the statistical analysis and historical trends, Dang is the likely favorite in this upcoming tennis match.
Yiming Dang vs Olivia Carneiro Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Dang vs O. Carneiro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:52:15 | Average Match Time | 1:52:15 |
| 57% (29/51) | 1st Serve % | 44% (30/68) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (13/38) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
| 56% (38/68) | Return Points Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Dang Recent Matches Played
O. Carneiro Recent Matches Played

Y. Dang vs O. Carneiro Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.74% (44/64) | YTD Win/Loss | 15.00% (3/17) |
| 43.21% (105/138) | Sets Win/Loss | 19.05% (8/34) |
| 47.94% (1119/1215) | Games Win/Loss | 35.38% (121/221) |
| 41.67% (35/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/11) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 182 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.58 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.65 |
| 662 | Total Double Faults | 108 |
| 1:37:16 | Average Match Time | 1:25:38 |
| 406.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 453.3 |
| 56% (3664/6572) | 1st Serve % | 56% (585/1051) |
| 60% (2200/3664) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (314/585) |
| 40% (1171/2908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (169/466) |
| 46% (385/846) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (39/105) |
| 46% (3019/6575) | Return Points Win % | 40% (388/973) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.75% (35/45) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 34.62% (9/17) | Futures W/L | 18.75% (3/13) |
| 40% (42/104) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 15% (3/20) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (14/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (11/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 80% (51/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 20% (51/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 5% (57/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (16/0) |